CORRELATION BETWEEN FUNDAL HEIGHT AND BIRTH WEIGHT IN TERM PREGNANCIES
Nema Mabano; MD.
Retrospective study carried out on 612 cases collected at 2 facilities; HEK and CVN, during a period of 3 years. (1 January 2015 - 31 December 2017) - BURUNDI
Abstract
Abstract
Main
objective: Evaluation of fundal height as a measure to predict
birth weight
Secondary
objectives: Identifying the number of small fundal heights
that resulted in low birth weight and large fundal heights that resulted to macrosomia
Materials
and Methods: for data collection, parturients’ charts
were a data source for this retrospective study; data collection was done on
field in a period of 1 January 2015 to 31 December 2017.
Results: 612
parturients were identified in the 2 facilities, fundal height results were as
follows in both facilities, the median = 31, mean = 31.33, SD = 2.447958, The mean SFH from CVN =
33.5cm,the mean SFH from HEK = 30cm.
The
average SFH at HEK is lower than the average SFH at CVN with a difference of
3.5cm.
Majority
of parturients had a fundal height of 30-34cm which accounts for 72.39%, the
birthweight results were as follows; newborns weighed between 2.5-4kg
accounting for 88.40% of the cases, while 9.97% of newborns had birth weights
less than 2.5kg and 1.63% with birth weights above 4kg
Conclusion:
From
the results of the study, we can safely conclude that fundal height is a fairly
accurate predictor of birthweight, our fundal heights are smaller
than expected for term pregnancies, but still can be accurate in predicting
birth weight, adjusted tables for our setting would be needed. SFH can serve as
a clinical indicator in anticipating pathological birthweights, and can be used
to complement modern techniques of predicting weight.
Read pdf
Read pdf
Comments
Post a Comment
Your views and comments are needed for our doing up.